Is Amanda Knox Receiving Financial Benefits from Loyola Law School After Innocence Program?

Knox Luncheon at Loyola Chicago Scheduled for December 3 at $2,500 Table

It seems someone is paying attention to the Donate button on Amanda Knox’s website. Has Loyola Law Chicago embraced the notorious convicted liar as an official “exoneree” eligible for all the legal and financial benefits offered by its Life After Innocence program?

The luncheon announcement tweet precipitated a social media reaction.

Many on Twitter seek further clarification and information. I tweeted several questions to the school, the Dean and directly to the Life After Innocence Program without receiving a single response.

The above link is taken directly from Loyola School of Law Chicago website page About Life After InnocenceKeep reading for further discussion about the program which is presented by the school in the murkiest of terms.  I don’t know about you, but I want to know……

“WHO is Funding Life After Innocence at Loyola?”

The student organizing the Knox luncheon, Carly Chocron, represents herself as an employee of the Cook County Public Defender’s Office as a Law Clerk. Is the Public Defender’s Office subsidizing the Innocence program? Loyola students allegedly submit their “billable” hours devoted to After Innocence, but there is no explanation of funding sources.

To whom or what entity do the law students submit their invoices for “billable hours”? Is there a distinction between Carly’s job as a Law Clerk at the Public Defender’s Office and her “billable hours” with the school’s “Life After Innocence” program?

Ms. Chocron’s blog dedicated to Amanda Knox and the upcoming event provoked a lively commentary on the Life After Innocence page, but the comments were subsequently deleted. With the exception of one new fawning comment about Carly’s “insightful analysis” now appearing on her blog, all other comments have been shut down. Now, if she were writing a private blog on her own privately-funded website, she could moderate and delete whatever she wants. This is NOT a private website or blog.  People were expressing disagreement with the program’s endorsement of Amanda Knox as a client, and asking questions. The public has a right to know how this program is funded. Who is in charge here? An emotional law student who declares Amanda Knox to be the “world’s most FAMOUS exoneree”??

And that’s not all that’s been deleted.


Why did the attendance list vanish? About ten registrants were listed, some representing their law firms. The list was public until today. Instead of responding to questions and concerns from the public, Loyola Law School Chicago and its Alumni Program appear to be concealing information and refusing to answer reasonable questions.  WHY?

Below is the invitation to the December 3rd Knox luncheon event.


Before it, too, disappears, let’s take a closer look at the fine print.

Your attendance and donation will support Loyola University Chicago’s Life After Innocence, which advocates for innocent people released from prison, helping them reenter society, clear their records and start their lives over. One credit hour of MCLE will be available.

Registration prices are steep for an event featuring a woman definitively convicted by the Supreme Court of Italy for the serious crime of calunnia. Attendees will pay up to $100 for a single ticket and $2,500 for a table of 8!  Continuing education credits are offered as well!  WHAT is remotely educational about having lunch with a convicted liar who is now on trial in Italy for her lies on the stand, in media interviews and in her book? As a special bonus, the table-sponsors get an autographed copy of the convicted liar’s book and attendees can spend personal time with her. Sickening and appalling. Event organizers should be cognizant about protecting the safety of other students and attendees.

The organizer of the event, Carly Chocron, linked merely a few media sources to prove the innocence of Amanda Knox. Think about this.  Law students are not even consulting official legal sources to conduct a thorough assessment of the victims of injustice for whom they commit to advocate. Clearly, Ms. Chocron and those responsible for the After Innocence Program are unaware of and/or discount the facts surrounding this case which was not even adjudicated in the United States! Did they read all the translated official court transcripts, evidence, testimony available on sites such as The Murder of Meredith Kercher?

As a Cliffs Notes version of the complicated case — are you reading, Ms. Chocron? —  the High Court upheld the lower and appellate court convictions for the defendant, Amanda Knox, confirming that she willfully — and without coercion — accused an innocent man of murder. She served three out of four years in a foreign prison for this crime and remains in contempt of that country’s court for her refusal to pay mandated restitution to the victim. She earned in excess of $4 million for her book of lies yet she couldn’t set aside approximately 22,000€ to pay the court-ordered damages to the victim? She ruined his reputation and his life. Diya Patrick Lumumba was publicly hauled off to prison for two weeks, lost his club Le Chic, and relocated from Perugia to Poland with his wife and young child. Ask Amanda Knox if she’s ever apologized for this crime?


Diya “Patrick” Lumumba, innocent victim of Amanda Knox’s false accusations of murder

Is this the calibre of “innocence” embraced by Loyola Law School? Apparently, yes. Read on for a more scathing indictment of Amanda Knox, as evidenced in the Supreme Court’s sentencing report.

Although Cassazione delivered a weak verdict of Not Guilty due to Insufficient Evidence [Article 530, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code] for the murder charges, the Court ruled that all three defendants, Amanda Knox, Raffaele Sollecito and Rudy Guede (the latter the only black defendant and the only defendant remaining in prison), were present in the house at the time Meredith Kercher was murdered. Astonishingly, also stated in the Supreme Court Motivations Report is that Amanda Knox’s epithelial DNA co-mingled with Meredith’s blood confirmed by Ms. Knox washing her hands of the victim’s blood!  [It defies logic that Knox and Sollecito weren’t convicted, at the very least, as accessories to the crime.] If you are incredulous at such a ruling, that is understandable, but read the original report in Italian, or the translated sections, all available at the above TMOMK wiki link I provided. For an excellent review and commentary, read here at True Justice for Meredith.

Caution:  the hasty translation published on the Amanda Knox website is inaccurate and deliberately biased. Read the comparisons provided over at TJMK.

Does Loyola Law School After Innocence Program Accept Public Funds?

The money trail is suspiciously undisclosed on the Loyola Law School websites. Correct me if I’m wrong, readers. I’d welcome knowing that I am mistaken and that there is indeed full disclosure of money sources for the Life After Innocence program.

It is clearly stated that registration fees for the Amanda Knox luncheon are considered “donations to the program.” Is the event solely privately funded? Who benefits? Amanda Knox? Other clients? The event organizer? Simple questions, are they not? If I’m donating to a specific cause, I want to know the specifics. Does Amanda Knox get paid and, if so, how much and from whom?

Could the program survive solely on private funds? If so, why is it not clarified? If public (i.e., taxpayer) funds are involved, the school is obligated to disclose to the public where the money is being funneled.  There are a few different locations on the Loyola websites dedicated to a description of the program, but the language is vague and leads to more questions.

The above actions and the ignoring of questions give the appearance that Loyola Law Chicago is hunkering down in secrecy mode. What is the school hiding about the Life After Innocence program? At initial glance, it appears that there is no official oversight, no chain of command so to speak. The students submit “billable hours” to some unknown entity, whatever that means. If employees of the Public Defender’s Office are involved (Carly Chocron), are they merging county and state funds and what is the specific role of County employees who participate in the Loyola Law School Innocence Program?

If the program assists Illinois “victims of wrongful conviction,” in accordance with Illinois statutes, why is the program advocating for Amanda Knox? She is a Washington State resident and her crimes were committed in a foreign country, adjudicated in a foreign country. Is she receiving the program benefits which include Pro Bono Legal Help, along with subsidized housing, health care and other “life” expenses?  Again, simple questions with no answers.

Has Amanda Knox been officially, legally certified as innocent, exonerated, wrongly convicted? What is the certification process and how could she possibly be certified as innocent in the United States when she committed her crimes in a foreign country?  Clearly, the After Innocence Program representatives have not even studied the evidence nor have they read the newly released Supreme Court sentencing report. That is negligence, folks.

Yes, it’s all clear as mud and gets murkier by the minute.

There is a distinct haughtiness on display by the program organizers (presumably) in the description provided here on the Innocence program’s About page. In particular, read about the Qualification Requirements.

…Life After Innocence ultimately retains discretion in deciding whether to accept a client to its program.”



Is there no independent oversight by the funding agencies, no government oversight, no oversight by the Loyola Law School authorities? As presented on the website, the program organizers make all the decisions and have “ultimate” authority to make very subjective, serious legal decisions about the innocence of previously convicted individuals. Clients receive pro bono legal guidance and extensive personal financial benefits. Shouldn’t some state and/or federal authorities in Illinois be reviewing the candidates and the money flow? Anyone?



I want answers. It is appalling that Amanda Knox is being fêted and celebrated by a prestigious American law school when she remains a convicted felon for life, is currently in contempt of court by refusing to pay damages to her victim, and she’s in the middle of another calunnia trial for her slanderous, libelous accusations against police, legal representatives and translators in Perugia!

What agencies have oversight of Loyola Law School’s Life After Innocence program? I would like to know and so do many others who object to convicted criminals being celebrated and funded. Stand up for justice, for the murder victim, Meredith Kercher, whose life ended brutally and violently at the age of 21 in the very cottage where Amanda Knox was present at the time of her murder.

Meredith Kercher

Meredith Kercher

Here are some contacts for initial inquiries about the administration of Loyola Law School Chicago’s Life After Innocence program. If the school would respond to questions, appealing to a higher authority wouldn’t be necessary.

Amanda Knox is not a victim and she deserves no special recognition, no pro bono legal help, and certainly no public funding.

Until next time,


Darlie Routier DNA Results: Why Does She Want Them Sealed?

DNA Results Don’t Support Darlie’s Innocence


Darlie Routier

Darlie Routier has been on a mission for many years to obtain updated DNA testing on the evidence presented at her trial. Despite constant begging for funds to conduct the court-granted testing, it dragged on for years. Darlie will go to any lengths if it means a shot at freedom. Any lengths. Long ago, she ordered the exhumation of her murdered young sons, Devon and Damon Routier, to obtain fingerprints. The boys were buried holding hands. Physicians were forced to detach their small entwined hands in order to get their fingerprints.

DamonAndDevonDetached is a polite way of saying their hands were chopped off.

Did you know that Darlie had life insurance policies on her children? At the time, 5-year old Damon and 6-year old Devon had a serious discussion with Mom just like all kindergarten-age children have with their parents, reviewing finances and instructions for their funeral and burial. They wanted to make sure Mom would be compensated when they were murdered died.  The boys requested knives in their shared casket and a recording of the song “Gangsta’s Paradise” by Coolio from the movie Dangerous Minds released in 1995, the year before the boys were murdered.  Ok, deliberate sarcasm about the discussion and the boys’ requests, but I’m dead serious that their parents bought life insurance and buried them as described. These are not normal people.

Folks, do not be deluded by this woman. She is a cunning, calculating, narcissistic killer.  Early prison glamour shot alert!

darlie-routier-10 So what are the results of updated DNA tests?

Good question. Both of Darlie’s websites, ForDarlieRoutier and DarlieFacts offered no information aside from copies of her request and the court orders for the testing. In fact, my search of her sponsored websites didn’t even uncover the original DNA results… unless I’m blind, unable to see information right in front of my nose. If I’m mistaken, please let me know. She does publish the most recent court order for the updated DNA tests dated July 18, 2014.

Side note: There are no photos of Devon and Damon on Darlie’s home page.  Nope, just pics of all-about-me narcissistic Darlie. If you want to see the “babies” she claims to adore, you’ve got to search for them.

While searching, don’t forget to donate to her prison commissary account!  So convenient, right there on her “innocence” website.

Darlie Court Order DNA sealed_editedBack to the DNA, thanks to a loyal reader and friend who has followed and studied this case for years, I saw a copy of the DNA results still in the public domain, dated June 17, 2015.

Darlie wants these results hidden from the world, obtaining a court order sealing the results dated August 15, 2015 (pictured left).

There are no surprises or get-out-of-jail “gotcha” results. The only profiles obtained were that of Darlie, her husband, Darin, and his patrilineal line, as indicated by the Y-STR Haplotype testing.  Some findings:

  • smudged bloody fingerprint on the glass table contains no male DNA (sorry Darlie, hope it was worth having your children’s hands cut off to obtain their prints)
  • the knife handle contains no male DNA (Darlie is a liar)
  • the tube sock contains male DNA that cannot exclude Darin Routier or his patrilineal relatives (was Darin involved in the coverup?)
  • her nightshirt revealed no foreign male DNA

Murder weapon from Darlie’s kitchen

There’s nothing new, nothing to support Darlie’s claims of innocence. In desperation, she threw Darin under the bus by implicating him in the recent CNN production “Death Row Stories” but it’s doubtful that will save her.

Darin and Darlie in happier dating days

Darin and Darlie in happier dating days

Due to her ruthlessness, stupidity and criminal arrogance, she’s probably succeeded in sealing her fate. Stay tuned for further articles.

RIP, Devon and Damon.

Until next time,


“Amanda Knox You Did It” rap-lyric video by Misty Von Kalow

A reader by the name of DavidB linked this video in his comment on a recent article by Peter Quennell over at TJMK. Be sure to read the article which contains lengthy excerpts of Knox’s contradictory testimony in her original trial.  In anticipation of the calunnia trial hearings scheduled to commence next week, the article is an excellent refresher on her lies and inconsistencies.

This creative young woman, Misty Von Kalow — who is the same age as Amanda — has delivered a challenge for Knox. Intelligent and perceptive, she knows Amanda Knox is lying and she smoothly renders a scathing indictment of the crime in a genre popular with her generation…rap.  Her message is clear and direct, and I won’t ruin it with spoilers.

A quick scan of the youtube commentary reveals that the Knox cavalry has already descended with typical attempts to sue, bully and intimidate. I encourage all who care about justice for Meredith Kercher to take the time to vote your support of the video on Youtube.

It’s evident that Misty  has seen and read enough to confront the far from a fox one to come clean.

Amanda Knox,  you did it….

It strikes me that Amanda Knox was so jealous of Meredith’s appearance in the Kristian Leontiou’s Some Say video that she tried to compete with her own (lame), now-defunct Hands of Time (HOT) video.  Remember how creepy it was?

I wonder if Misty has seen the lovely Meredith’s appearance in the Some Say video.

Amanda Knox, you will NEVER be anything but a Meredith wannabe.

RIP Meredith.

Until next time,


Dear Amanda Knox Fan-addicts…Welcome to my Spam Folder

Unruly Knox Fans Beg for Smackdown

I'm the bossGUESS what, guys and gals?

Threats and insults won’t get your comments published, nor will they intimidate me.

You Just Don’t Get It.  I spelled out the rules and you defy them. Sadly, there is no cure for numbskulls and narcissists.

(Your idol has been acquitted of murder. Have you heard? She doesn’t need you anymore.)

Demonstrate some self-respect instead of whining and clamoring to be heard here on Justice4ever, a site you abhor.  What is wrong with you?


It’s disturbing that an entire subgroup of people like you exists, randomly inflicting your delusions, dumbness, stalking and personality disorders on complete strangers.

As explained above, it’s quite simple. Call it an implied contract. I make the rules, I do the researching and writing and control the content. You are free to lurk and read all you want. Have I mentioned that I’m the owner? I write, you read…or ideally, you go away. Abusers and crazies don’t have rights here.

loserEmojiTo the Pacific Northwest residents who lurk here, send nasty threatening communications and attempt to intimidate me into publishing your comments, get a life. Your geographic area is heavily represented in my spam folder.

Here’s a dose of reality therapy, a proposed mantra. Start every day with the following recitation. Own it.  Self-awareness just might set you free.

I am a loser.  I’m a(n) hybristophile, addicted to criminal felons and accused murderers.  I enjoy abusing and harassing people. Especially families of murder victims and those who support them.  It makes me feel crazy alive and powerful.

No one will sloth-shame me.  Real work, creativity and effort are for suckers.  I could purchase my own website, or even blog for free  (because I’m cheap and/or bankrupt).  But I’m a lazy dumbass at heart (shhh, my secret) and besides it’s fun to troll websites, blogs, articles, social media, forums and message boards. It’s entertaining to harass and stalk people.  I’m very special and entitled.  I like who I am.


Until next time,


The Shocking Racism & Anti-Semitism of Amanda Knox and the Fans who Worship Her

“The Nazi Within”

Knox with gun

Before her ill-fated arrival in Perugia, Italy, in the Fall of 2007,  Amanda Knox did some of the things tourists do in Europe.  She spent some time with her mother’s sister and husband in Germany, the details of that visit worthy of another post altogether.  Her mother, Edda, is German-born and also lived in Austria during her childhood.  Deeply proud of her Germanic descent, Knox and her younger sister, Deanna, spent some time that August 2007 touring Austria. In the historic town of Graz, they visited a war memorial museum where Amanda was inspired to have Deanna photograph her posing awkwardly crouched on the floor by the circa World War I-era machine gun.

The resulting photograph offers a snapshot of the impulsiveness and insensitivity that would characterize her entire misguided adventure in the university town of Perugia. With a demeanor of careless abandonment, head back, eyes closed and mouth gaping wide in laughter, Amanda later posted the image on her Myspace page titled The Nazi Within. (I shudder to ponder the reaction of the other museum visitors that day.)


“My People Killed Your People”

Matthew seemed to be happy enough with his life and job at World Cup. He told me he was on the wagon. Had been on it for a while. He had no plans to get off it for a while. After catching up on things, I asked him about Knox. He used to work with her and had lots to say about her and the media frenzy that she is in the center of. Almost immediately after her arrest in Italy, reporters from around the world began hounding the small cafe. They showed up in droves and sat around waiting for something to happen. And when they were not around, they kept calling and asking about Knox, about her personality, her performance on the job, her habits—anything that was fit enough to throw into print or on the screen.

“You know,” Matthew said, leaning toward me, “a lot of people are saying she is a sweet girl and they can’t believe she could have done such a thing. But, to be honest, I’m not surprised she is a suspect. Really. The first time I met her, when I got the job here, she asked me if I was Jewish. I told her I was. She then screamed: ‘My people killed your people,’ and began laughing hysterically. I didn’t know what to say. She just kept laughing about her Germans killing my Jews. After that, I did not like her. She really freaked me out.”

Excerpted from The Education of Amanda Knox by Charles Mudede, February 7, 2008

In the days preceding Curt Knox’s engagement of Seattle public PR representative David Marriott, there were some candid opinions offered up to the press by friends, acquaintances, fellow students of Knox. These very early interviews are essential in forming an impression of the person of Amanda Knox. In retrospect, as more is known about her all these years later, some light is shed upon her father’s urgency to hire a public relations expert.  Clearly, he knew his daughter better than she thought he did.

Within three days of Amanda’s arrest, publicist David Marriott shut down any access to the Knox family, or anyone connected to her. Marriott himself later acknowledged that his strategy “helped reshape how the world saw the young American.”  (And influenced a verdict.) That is PR-speak for a client in desperate need of an image overhaul; in this case, not a politician nor sports star, but an emotionally troubled, immature 20-year-old woman from Seattle. Continue reading

Acquittal of Amanda Knox: Italian Supreme Court Presiding Judge Talks to Media

Judge Gennaro Marasca Speaks About the Verdict

[A word of acknowledgment to the translators — including Jools — of an article appearing in Corriere del Mezzogiorno on March 29, 2015. Your work is much appreciated.]


Gennaro Marasca

Gennaro Marasca

A couple of days following the Italian Supreme Court’s acquittal this March of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito (for murdering  Meredith Kercher), presiding Judge Gennaro Marasca of the Cassazione’s 5th Division was deluged with phone calls. Curious colleagues were blowing up his phone regarding the unexpected acquittal.  Marasca, the well-respected President of the Fifth Chamber Division of the Court, uncharacteristically granted the following original Italian interview to Corriere del Mezzogiorno on March 29, 2015.

The Murder of Meredith Kercher  — Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, the evidence was insufficient

The doubts of Gennaro Marasca, the Neapolitan judge who presided over the Supreme Court of Cassation panel that acquitted the two defendants accused of the murder of Meredith in Perugia.

Someone like him, someone who has spent a whole career condemning ‘the judges who speak to journalists’ (the last time he did was on the board council of the Supreme Court, criticizing his colleague Antonio Esposito for the interview granted after the conviction of Silvio Berlusconi), someone like this is certainly not a magistrate to go for interviews — after the verdict that has split Italy sending [sic] definitively discharged Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, defendants in the trial for the murder of British student Meredith Kercher.

Yet, despite the [his] reluctance, the judge was unable to avoid the phone calls from colleagues and friends from Naples, all looking (in vain) for any details.

And now, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Supreme Court that issued the ruling two days ago is a magistrate from Naples — Gennaro Marasca, one of the best known “robes” in the city.  He, with the always [sic] courtesy, has limited himself to respond to everyone that the sentence will speak for itself, but that the decree of ruling issued at the end of the trial can already say many things.  What acquitted Amanda and Raffaele was the same identical manner in which the former senator for life Giulio Andreotti was acquitted — that is, applying the second paragraph of Article 530 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

There is, in this Marasca explanation, most of the reasons for the judgment, since the rule states that “the judge pronounces judgment of acquittal even when it fails, is insufficient or is contradictory evidence that the fact exists or that the accused committed it.”  And, not surprisingly, at the Palazzaccio [SC] Piazza Cavour in Rome, it is noted that an article of the law is rarely indicated (as in this case) in a decree of ruling of the Court of Cassation.

An Excellency

And to say {sic] that Marasca wasn’t even supposed to get to those courtrooms. — certainly not because of demerits (he is considered one of the best judges in Naples, and not by chance. On January 25th 2014,  the head public prosecutor of Nola, Paolo Mancuso, cited him among the “excellency” (together with Carlo Alemi. Giuseppe Fusco and Nino Vacca), but because his ambition – four years ago – was to be nominated prosecutor general of Naples.

He applied to the CSM [translator’s note: the magistrates’ governing body, but it was rejected. The reason? It so happens that, in the country where judges put their robes back on after doing politics, the magistrates’ governing body decided not to nominate him because “it can’t be ignored – as written in the motivation report – that Marasca has held for several years after 1994, the post of council member for the city” at the time when Antonio Bassolino was mayor.

 Justice was served: it’s our job

That episode is now forgotten. Marasca more than once has reiterated that “I like my job at Cassazione,” also because – he confided to some of his colleagues – it’s that place where “we try to apply the law sometimes forgotten in local offices.”  And as an experienced judge, Marasca has even been able to manage the sudden popularity in an Italy that was divided between those who exulted at the acquittal of Amanda and Raffaele and those who instead contested the decision. To those who asked him [Marasca] if justice had been served, he replied that a judge must base his decision on the elements of the trial and that, therefore, “justice had been served only because we did our job.”  Of course, the most simple solution would have been to annul the appeal and remand to a new trial, but the “insufficient evidence” was judged “difficult to be filled” even later.  And therefore – the president explained to the colleagues – if those are the elements, “what need is there to have a new trial?” [End]



I happened upon the above article while researching Amanda Knox’s current trial on the calunnia charges resulting from wild tales of police brutality.The charges are very serious in Italy, roughly the equivalent of obstruction of justice in the United States. More about this in a future post..

Knox Fan Base Promotes Unofficial Dispositivo of Italian Code of Criminal Procedure

Back in late March, while the rest of us were still processing Cassazione’s unexpected ruling,  a discernible pattern of tweets and comments began floating around social media. Within mere days, an “official” translation of the ruling emerged:.

Cited here is the specific criminal code

Italian Criminal Code of Procedure Article 530 Paragraph (2)  Il giudice pronuncia sentenza di assoluzione anche quando manca, è insufficiente o è contraddittoria la prova che il fatto sussiste, che l’imputato lo ha commesso, che il fatto costituisce reato o che il reato è stato commesso da persona imputabile.

English Translation (Google)  The judge pronounces acquittal even when there is insufficient or contradictory evidence that the thing certain, that the accused committed it, that the action constitutes a criminal offense or the offense was committed by a person due The court judgment of acquittal even when it is missing, and insufficient or contradictory evidence that the fact there is, that the accused has committed, that the fact is a criminal offense or the offense was committed by a person eligible. [END]

Judge Marasca did deliver a brief oral statement to the press at the conclusion of deliberations on the night of March 27, 2015, but there is not an official summary, nor is the Dispositivo (verdict) published on the Court’s website.

Judge Marasca compared the Knox-Sollecito acquittal to the 2002 conviction of former Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti (for murder), and subsequent acquittal. Rarely cited in Cassazione rulings, this code seems to be the catch-all for awkward acquittals. My inquiries and probing about the official document claims were noticed. Knox apologist, Lyn Duncan — along with what’s-her-name, Lyn’s tag-along follower of the sour disposition   —  hate my guts while continuing their peculiar scrutiny of my website and social media.  Don’t try to figure it out. It’s complicated.  😉

However, the same scrutiny applied to their own social media results in same old aspersions. stalker, cognitively-challenged, idiot.  Call me what you like, fans, but your latest brainchild is a big fail.   Word to the wise: Don’t manipulate and spin the High Court’s ruling, especially since it’s not officially published. That’s right, no official publication yet.   But It gets crazier. Continue reading